Hubert H. Humphrey Rebuttal 3
Question 3: Given Minnesota's climbing prison population, the public pressure to reduce taxes and an apparent stalemate in the war on drugs, how would you, as governor, balance the cost of criminal justice with the need to ensure the safety of Minnesotans?
I notice that each of the other responding candidates chose to use their response to question three as a forum to advocate liberalizing Minnesotas drug laws. However, the question was "how would you, as Governor balance the cost of criminal justice with the need to ensure the safety of Minnesotans?" My earlier response articulated a number of strategies to make our criminal justice system more cost effective. As I indicated before, I strongly support steps to reduce the cost of incarceration. Among them are increasing use of double-bunking, ensuring systems are at capacity and ensuring efficient incarceration use. I have supported measures which require criminals to help pay for their care. I have initiated legislation to curtail costly, frivolous inmate lawsuits. It is also important to make effective use of our probation systems. Through the efforts of prosecutors, law enforcement and community, our crime rates are going down, not up. In my view, any level of crime is unacceptable whether it is graffiti on a neighborhood wall or the gangland slaying of our youth. The human cost of crime is intolerable. Its economic impact is huge. When compared to the cost of corrections, the cost of crime is enormously expensive. A report by the Justice Department estimates that crime costs Americans more than $450 billion a year, not including the costs of corrections. We must continue our efforts to combat both the economic and social costs of crime. As Attorney General, I have been instrumental in leading the state in aggressive measures to create victim rights legislation, develop anti-stalking legislation, establish comprehensive sexual violence legislation, create one of the first state DNA labs in the nation, develop a system for registration of sex offenders, enhance protections against child abuse. I am also proud of my work to establish a statewide criminal gang strike force and improving mandatory prison terms on felons with guns. This is only a partial list. For a more extensive report about my record in keeping Minnesota safe, see "Criminal Justice" at http://www.humphrey98.org. Each of these measures is designed to reduce the cost of crime. Contrary to the suggestions of my opponents, these measures do not automatically result in incarceration of the working people. Minnesota has led the nation in the use of restorative justice. We have established drug courts that focus on immediate response and treatment of addicted offenders. We have created a boot camp to give low-level offenders discipline and save the costs of incarceration. Our use of effective intermediate sanctions is an important component in our strategy to manage the costs of corrections. Finally, I want to emphasize the import important work of keeping our young people out of the criminal justice system through prevention, protection and restraint. Ultimately, that will be the most cost-effective measure of all.
Minnesota
E-Democracy 2718 East 24th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55406 612.729.4328 e-democracy@freenet.msp.mn.us |