QUESTION #2 - November 2, 1994: >People are saying Congress is broken; our government isn't working. Do you agree? >In general terms, explain why or why not. As a parent, homeowner and businessman I have seen government at its best and its worst. When we are free to raise our children, invest in our families' futures, and provide for our families, then government is doing its job. However, excessive government intrusion destroys this balance, weakening all three links. Unfortunately, the Congress has lost sight of this philosophy and lost the confidence of the American people. Congress has become a bloated institution which is more interested in serving itself than the very people they are elected to serve. Congressional reform is long overdue. I am a citizen legislator. Having set my own 12 year term limit, the first bill I coauthored in Congress would establish term limits for all politicians. Unlike my opponent, Ann Wynia, I believe a Congress comprised of "professional politicians" does not reflect the values and concerns of average Americans. It is clear that after 13 years in politics, Ann Wynia has lost touch with Minnesota taxpayers -- otherwise she would not have raised our taxes over 300 times. We have learned that too much power being invested in one person corrupts our government. The House Bank and Post Office scandals are prime examples of why we don't need any more Chairman Rostenkowski's in the U.S. Congress. That is why I have spent the past two years working to establish rotating congressional committee chairs and want to eliminate unnecessary subcommittees and excessive committee staff. One of the first reform measures I authored led to the elimination of four select committees, saving nearly $3 million in 1993 alone. And on the House floor, I successfully passed an amendment to prohibit taxpayer funds from being used to relocate Members' House offices in the middle of the legislative session. This reform measure has already saved taxpayers over $100,000. Unless Congress can spend thousands of dollars with care, we will never be able to spend trillions of dollars wisely. Most recently, I supported legislation which would require Congress to live under the same laws it passes. The federal government should not set one standard for the rest of the nation and then exempt itself from compliance. Unfortunately, the democratic leadership killed the bill in the Senate because they feared it would be too costly. Unfortunately, these same Senate democrats ignore the potential impact these laws have on American jobs and on consumers. I believe cost-benefit analysis should be required prior to enactment of all federal laws and regulations. This would ensure the laws Congress passes are balanced. This is a concept Ann Wynia opposes -- probably because she has never held a job in the private sector, a job which could have been regulated right out of existence by a faceless bureaucrat in Washington. As Minnesota's next U.S. Senator, I will be that commonsense voice. I will carry the message I have heard from Minnesotans as I traveled thru our 87 counties; "get government off my back and out of my back pocket." Rod Grams Candidate for U.S. Senate